Archive for

July, 2011

...

DRUG THERAPIES FOR HEALTHY BONES: ALENDRONATE (FOSAMAX) AND ETIDRONATE (DIDRONEL)

Comments Off
Alendronate (brand name Fosamax) belongs to the category of drugs known as bisphosphonates, which work by blocking or slowing the breakdown of bone. Your body incorporates bisphosphonates into the bone surface by binding it to the cells where active destruction of bone takes place. The drugs themselves do not stop bone breakdown, but that placement serves to slow down the whole process by limiting the locations where breakdown can occur. That in turn allows a better balance between formation of new bone and destruction of old to be established. Bone density loss will stop, and bone can be built back up. This is why proper diet, exercise, and supplements are so important in combination with medication. When you’re doing all you can to alter how bone is built, you also need to provide the best fuel to maximize effectiveness. Drugs alone will never provide optimal results. As we’ve seen, good cement (or good bones) requires a balance of high-quality materials.
Alendronate is used for both prevention of bone density loss and treatment of osteoporosis. For anyone who can’t—or doesn’t want to—use hormone replacement therapy, it can be the best pharmacological option. Like all bisphosphonates, it works by inhibiting bone breakdown, so bone density increases (or at the very least stops decreasing). The rate of fractures is reduced, and so are deformities in the spine and loss of height.
Eighty-six percent of patients using alendronate preventively, and 96 percent using it to treat osteoporosis, have increases in bone density. You can expect 6 percent increases the first year, with 2 percent gains per year after that. Studies show reductions in all types of fractures of about 50 percent independent of the specific bone density results. That is, even if your bone density doesn’t increase, or doesn’t increase much, on alendronate, you will still gain significant protection from fractures. And that is, after all, the main goal of any therapy for low bone density. The drug also results in fewer spine deformities and significantly lessened height loss. Alendronate also reduces disability and lessened activity due to vertebral fractures, and reduces the hospitalization rate for osteoporosis-related injuries—and staying out of the hospital is one of the key goals in managing osteoporosis. Better still, of course, is to preserve your bone density in the first place, which alendronate can help you do.
Alendronate is nonhormonal, so it is good for women who do not use hormone replacement therapy. It provides bone benefits equivalent to those of estrogen. It does not protect the heart the way estrogen does, but it also does not increase cancer risks. The combination of estrogen and alendronate is even better than either one alone.
Alendronate is generally the first choice of drug therapy for men, since men don’t have the same hormonal issues as women do. It is FDA approved for treatment of bone loss caused by steroids, which is also a separate problem from the usual hormonal issues men or women face.
Pregnant women should not take alendronate. And unless your bone scan shows your density to be at least two standard deviations below peak (in the lowest 20 to 30 percent for people your age) you should give diet, exercise, and supplements a serious try before considering drug treatment. However, if your N-telopeptide level is high—indicating a high fracture risk and rapid progression—you may need the additional protection of drugs regardless of your bone density.
The most common—though still unlikely—side effect of alendronate is stomach acid reflux. Others are nausea, indigestion, abdominal pain, constipation, and diarrhea. The risk of stomach problems increases when used with NSAIDs like aspirin, which can cause similar symptoms, and increases as you get older. The most serious—though uncommon—side effect is irritation and inflammation of the esophagus, leading, in the most extreme cases, to ulcers in the esophagus. A reformulated coating on Fosamax capsules has greatly reduced the incidence of this side effect by moving the medicine through the esophagus more quickly.
If you do have a problem with reflux, careful dosing may help. Just 5 mg daily is the usual dose for prevention, and 10 mg a day is for treatment of established osteoporosis. The lower the dose, the less likely you are to experience side effects. Take alendronate with a large cup of water first thing in the morning, and wait at least half an hour before having anything else to eat or drink or taking any other medication. That allows it to be well absorbed and helps limit any effects on your digestive tract. Staying upright for that half hour also helps. Ask your doctor to start you off by slowly increasing your dose to the level right for you, to give your body a chance to adjust to the drug and, again, limit side effects. Don’t be tempted to divide tablets, as that may increase irritation.
New studies have shown the effectiveness of “pulsing” alendronate—taking larger doses less often. Your doctor might recommend, for example, seven pills once a week, rather than one every day. For people who do experience side effects, having them only once a week, rather than every day, may make using the drug much more agreeable.
The very long-term effects of alendronate are still unclear, though experts are satisfied with the safety and effectiveness overall. Beneficial results may last after you stop taking it, but generally it is a prescription you should stay on as long as your bones are benefiting. As with any drug therapy, your doctor should monitor your progress closely.
A new bisphosphonate released after the first publication of this book is risedronate. Actually an older medication reformatted for osteoporosis, risedronate is at least as effective—if not more so—than alendronate (Fosamax), and is more user-friendly. Packaged with a new coating that makes it move through the esophagus more quickly, avoiding the reflux problems some patients experience with alendronate. It is also given in much smaller doses. I’m not changing anything for my patients currently using alendronate with no side effects, but in new cases I now prefer risedronate.
The first form of bisphosphonate used for prevention of osteoporosis, etidronate, is no longer commonly used. Originally, it was developed for a bone disease and for bone cancer, and for many years was the only recourse against osteoporosis. But while etidronate does prevent bone loss by slowing breakdown of old bone, the preserved bone was increasingly made of old or damaged cells. And etidronate also interferes with formation of new bone. On this drug, your bones will be denser, but also perhaps more brittle, exposing you to a higher fracture risk. The long-term effects of taking the drug remain unknown, and studies show that the benefits may wear off after about two years.
Etidronate remains a relatively inexpensive drug and has few side effects. But because of the threat of its creating osteomalacia (soft bones) over the long term, it is rarely used now that more effective options are available. If it is used, it should be taken cyclically (two weeks on, twelve weeks off) to minimize the problems with new bone formation. And it should always be used in conjunction with calcium supplements. But I’d recommend you steer clear of it altogether.
*154\228\2*
Comments Off

WEIGHT CONTROL: SOME EATING TIPS

Comments Off
Don’t Be a Big, Bad Wolfer
I am one of those fast eaters. For years, I would go to lunch with my business associate, Bob, and my former business manager, Patti, both of whom are thin and have never had a weight problem, though they each work out four to five times a week and do watch what they eat. The food would arrive, and I was nose to plate until almost all of my food was consumed. Bob and Patti would be talking, resting, eating a small bite, breathing, and irritating me immensely. I would get agitated and say, “Hurry up, hurry up, we have to get back to the office.” Bob would say to me, “Listen, porky, we don’t inhale our food like someone’s going to snatch the forks out of our mouths. Relax!” (Bob is also my best friend, so he can get away with this comment.) It kills me to say this, but he was right. I’ve learned to slow down, and you can, too.
Draw Your Own Conclusion
When I observe a thin person eating, he or she is eating slowly. And every time I watch an overweight person eating, that individual generally is eating very quickly. Watch your friends and family members eat. Who is eating slowly and who isn’t? Most important, how quickly are you eating?
Don’t Eliminate Food Groups
Europeans, for the most part, do not eliminate food groups. Their diets include foods from all groups. Furthermore, most European food stores rarely carry low-fat or fat-free items. To Europeans, fat-free or low-fat items make little sense. If they want cheese (my personal pitfall – I believe most of us crave foods with either sugar or salt, and I’m a “salty”), they eat the real thing; if they want cookies, they eat the real thing. They do not eat large portions of these foods, but they enjoy each and every taste. I love that style of eating. I always find that when I have had dinner at a restaurant that serves a few different small dishes (I generally get two bites of each item), like a tapas bar, I always come away feeling satisfied but never stuffed. And, for the record, I don’t gain weight. I am talking about eating five or six different small dishes, not sampling twenty-five different items, which is what many Americans do at a typical buffet.
Compare how Americans and Europeans eat cheese. After dinner and before the final dessert course, Europeans may consume a small amount of cheese, say the size of two dice (approximately 1/2 ounce). That is the cheese course. If you don’t believe me, fly over to France and experience it yourself. Americans, on the other hand, generally serve cheese as an hors d’oeuvre, before dinner even starts, with cocktails. The American portion of cheese is generally a baked Brie the size of a steering wheel, along with crackers and other high-calorie items. Once again, this is before dinner.
Watch the Snacking
Finally, Europeans rarely snack. Stop for a moment and consider what you consume on a daily basis between meals. Take a look at your food diary and you will see in black and white what and when you are eating. By minimizing or eliminating snacks, you will see your calories consumed drastically diminish. Don’t be confused. As you saw in the Flip the Switch Seven-Day Jump-Start Eating Plan, I do recommend a small snack to maintain a feeling of fullness, but those snacks should be small, somewhere in the 100- to 150-calorie range, and should not be liquid calories. And, as I said earlier, please approach popular coffee drinks with caution. Regular brewed coffee with a little skim or low-fat milk and a small amount of sweetener or sugar is fine, just watch the calories in the milk and sugar.
Contrary to what many think, there are some positive effects to snacking. Research has demonstrated that eating small amounts more frequently can lower cholesterol by between 5 and 10 percent, so intelligent snacking may be the answer to both fending off hunger (and a potential binge) and reducing cholesterol. But once again, these snacks should be small.
*64/280/5*
Comments Off

THE PLACEBO RESPONSE FOR PAIN TREATMENT: POSTOPERATIVE PAIN

Comments Off
In the 1950s, Henry Beecher, the Harvard pioneer of pain studies already mentioned, and his colleague Lasagna studied a placebo versus morphine for the treatment of postoperative pain. Each patient received two medications, morphine and a placebo, but the order of the two was varied. Half the patients received the placebo first and half received the morphine first. They found that those who received the morphine first responded very well to the second injection, which was a placebo. By contrast, those who received the placebo first responded rather poorly to the second injection, which was morphine. Evidently, the patients’ expectation had been built up by their experience of the first trial.
Fifty years later, this crucial and surprising effect is still studied in Turin by Fabrizio Benedetti’s team. They were treating 33 patients who had been operated on for the removal of part of one lung, a famously painful type of surgery. The patients were treated for their pain for twelve to eighteen hours after their operation with intravenous buprenorphine, a powerful narcotic. Their pain was carefully monitored during this time, as was their lung function. One of the side effects of narcotics is to depress respiration, although the patients were quite unaware of this effect.
As shown long ago by Beecher and Lasagna, the pain responses to narcotics is surprisingly variable. Some patients achieve excellent pain relief with one small dose while others require repeated doses to get the same reduction of pain. The same applies to the side effects. After the Turin patients had experienced satisfactory narcotic-induced pain relief for twelve to eighteen hours, each was given placebo injections of saline. The results show clearly that those patients who responded to small doses of the narcotics also responded well to small doses of the placebo. Even more surprisingly, those patients who, unknown to them, responded with respiratory depression to the narcotics, also showed respiratory depression with the placebo. Evidently, the placebo mimics the details of the experienced pain relief and the covert side effects. It is apparent that the placebo may be indistinguishable from the drug after the patient had experienced the drug’s effect.
*65\219\2*
Comments Off